Questioning Religious Ethos

Category: Religious Resolution

Author: wizanda

Date: 2006/8/19

Now within the ethos of any religious or dogmatic behaviour; it inherently produces an opposite and so is then in fact bad, if you proclaim your good above another persons.

Keywords: Questioning,Oneness,Marriage,Religious,Ego,Possessions

Summary: Now within the ethos of any religious or dogmatic behaviour; it inherently produces an opposite and so is then in fact bad, if you proclaim your good above another persons.

There is this weird thought, that needs explaining and hopefully I will understand it my self. That if someone loves something they call a God being Good, then 95% of the time they are the people who dislike other people or even hate them for the natural ways. Now when I died and what we can also in see in spiritual books is that we are asked to keep oneness to get into heaven this is all and hell is (EGO). Now when someone hates others as they declare them bad, this is in it self darkness and later where the ego comes from if the impose these views on others. So not actually helping matters; so with this in mind, It would make any over religious and zealous religious person claiming their good before another persons and the worst is not even their won good yet another mans truth proclaimed as a religion over others. Now the dictionary references to that are the specifications of a cult….oops looks as though we are in a mess, as no wonder people don’t get into heaven and why Christ stood against the travelling to other nations to make disciples. Well considering the Pharisee did so regardless it sort of makes it more clearer yet most of you have no ideas that Paul john and peter the stone or Simon all where fake and the bible does say that in Greek yet not English. So how are we to begin to see when most people come here proclaiming God, now to me if they need to proclaim it is through lack of their own. As those who know and so in fact it is a complete reversal almost like double bluff in poker, people who wave a shield of some books and proclaim it as anything will of course cause the opposite effect always. As that is the nature of people so those who are religious is that not those who are fearful of true faith? As truth faith need no names and so in that we have mistakenly trusted and allowed contracts that have no place in the home. In fact this causes more friction and ruining people’s life’s trying to keep said rules. Now that is not to stand against any preacher speaker or teacher i.e. Mohammed Yeshua, Buddha and the many others yet to say those who later proclaim that is their in which they follow. Can’t do! As in each persons it was by example they gave up all and led the people from what they believed, it doesn’t help the system is laid out by the Pharisee to begin with, yet we let them, so we can’t moan. Just got to fix it like it was before. Now if we had a temple of the lord here for instance, how long do you think the debate would last on which name to choose? And so in that how can we have any? To be real! So who ever says God, should question even that, why miss an o out of oneness and make it into something that must have an equal an opposite reaction. So in claiming God, the denies that all are good and so is intermittently bad as you become a taker of others in proclaiming anything like that. As almost every religious person we speak to will claim that others are bad and they are not the cause…. Well in fact it is the other way around if you can afford to read this how? Can a charity help people when they give 20.000£ of its original sum to the managing director ect? We are so Pharisee it is a joke, and none see any more or realize what the Pharisee are or where with their one wife! Lol Christ said Jacob, Isaac and Abraham and if we check back how many wife’s and why the same seat as Moses is given to the Pharisees? So in that when we make all these rules and say we are married you are wrong this is bad (would say evil yet harsh word). As when you proclaim this; how many dinner parties must a single person go to until they join this cult. as that is what it is. No way did Christ stand with marriage; as Moses or man suggested, yet the laws of God and so when you lie down you are married…sleep with another you separate…. As we wrote earlier in another article legal binding documents is a form of Satan; as it always at some point the accuser and Satan mean accuser of the soul! In fact marriage is the worse sin going really; as it just makes others feel bad and fighting over possessions, when you can not own another person. As how many times a day do you keep committing sins looking at others? Proclaiming you are good in your marriages, yet see some one you like and we cant help yet ponder… Anda there goes eternity. As in no where in heaven is there need for that, it is a sick equation produced by this need for attachment and physical love, when there is a far greater love of oneness. Which is heaven and is us as one family as if we didn’t have all these secluded religions taking what oneness gave us, as each one spoke as oneness. Not in opposition yet that is what religious leaders tell us, some break the mould. Yet in no mean enough as most will stick within the separation and in that no ways separate to the one true good. Which in understanding even the word Namaste is that we all are one, which energy within you is within everything? So to kill eat another living thing or take another person suffering is an illness. It doesn’t help the person, it might temporary cover that person in another’s ego, yet later they get home and still regret the moment in the life. Then the real good gets to work and away from all what was spoken, it isn’t ever the words as people learn from what is not said most often. If they see some example or hear, they will add in the gaps this is what is remembered by many. So if a person on stage is consciously in a book some where in what way shape or form is that anything new you couldn’t do your self and get far more from it.

Articles V1.01

URL: http://www.wizanda.com/modules/article/view.article.php/c3/137