Rectifying the Islamic Trinity Problem

Posted by wizanda on 1639996749
Theology has become confused globally, as people don't read all the religions as one body of text.
Yahavah in the Bible is a translation of Bhagavan Brahma (Lord of Creation); where Brahma (Sanskrit), and Havah (Hebrew) mean the same thing. They both come from the root breath, and mean to be, to make manifest, to create, and thus is used as the Lord of Creation in both.
Brahma is only an aspect of Brahman, & Yahavah is only an aspect of El Elyon, that interacted with reality for the Source.
El Elyon in Hebrew is the God Most High, and Ala Ilah is the God Most high in Arabic; where Allah is defined as the God Most High throughout the Quran.
Therefore when the Quran is saying we should only have one Lord, and no partners, we need to understand this from the perspective, that in ancient times people turned the Divine Council into demigods (polytheism).
The Divine Council (Elohim) should be understood like Archangels or Avatars; where everything comes from the Source (Allah, El Elyon, Ahura Mazda, Chronos, Brahman, Universal Mind, etc).
The Divine Council is a Oneness with Allah, as it is aspects of Allah's qualities interacting with reality. This is where the Quran tries to correct the mistaken theology of making all three equal in the Trinity. The Messiah is a small part of Allah's Word made manifest, and shouldn't be understood as being Allah, as Allah is ultimately the Source of our whole reality. The Holy Spirit is everywhere as Allah is everything, and the reality is made from Allah's Word.
Ultimately from this theological comprehension, it shows Moses was right when he prophesied in Deuteronomy 32:16-18, that some people would become henotheists.
The reason though for some people worshipping a Trinity, is because in the past we didn't have access to the resources we have today. It is possible through education to show these errors, and fix the theological miscomprehensions.

This Post was from: https://www.wizanda.com/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=2525&post_id=5173