Re: The cause of differences and quarrel among beliefs?

Posted by qOLOp on 1118265392

More things to think about:
You said:
"ok. Well, christians believe that you have to be born again. That means that we are all born once of the flesh and then once we have knowledge of Christ we are accountable for that. A baby who doesn't have the chance to have knowledge is therefor exempt from this requirement. If they die before or after birth then then go straight to heaven to the arms of God."

Catholics are Christians and they don't believe in rebirth. This demonstrates that withing Christianity there is conflict of "belief." Any group can believe anything they want even though senseless and call that "the word of God."
That is a defamation of God and a defamation of intelligence, reasoning. True knowledge is consistent throughout.

You said:
"I also must object to you saying that God never took human flesh. Jesus, Yeshua, was said to be 100% God and 100% man in that His bloodline and spirit came from God but he was born of a woman and took on flesh. YOu don't believe that and that is your choice."

It is a matter of simple reasoning. Why God himself needs to experience suffering? perhaps He needs to be punished? That is not reasonable. To talk about "bloodline from God" ... what is the bloodline of a soul? Moreover to say that God is sending himself to pay for the original sin of Adam and Eve it is as irrational as saying that He is sending his own son...besides, what is the free-will that any human being has if from the beginning everyone is a "sinner"? for a "sin" that I have not performed?.. and then God sends his son or "part" of himself to "pay" this debt...This is a little too much...

Jesus gave teachings and these teachings have been misinterpreted....2000 years later things are even worse than before (even though the "debt" has been paid.)
It is time to see this with fresh new eyes.