A Governance and Economic System to Fix Sociology

Posted by wizanda on 1629276452

Many people keep arguing about communism, capitalism, democracy, etc... The problem with the topic is people are mixing types of definitions, and not identifying certain characteristics we all expect.

Capitalism is going to exist in any type of system where we have desires for goods, as we're all going to accumulate, so that exists, it can't be removed... Yet the way that finances is governed depends on the economic state.

Thus a better model of a capitalist system that takes the best ideas of communism, and socialism, is to allow that people who have wealth put back into the lower classes. So if someone is an entrepreneur, it should be governed that they have to invest into hospitals, schools, physical exercise, etc; so that the workers are better trained, healthier, and more manageable.

If we started this system within the religious structuring of society it would become a social norm, so if someone is wealthy and goes to some sort of religious worship, this should be more seen as a charity event, where the money paid in goes directly to charity. Where churches become community hubs, where there is free food, community support, with funding from those in society who can afford it. That way when we see people going to church on a holy day, we will think of them as the charitable, and we think of the church as a corner hub of society to support the poor.

This same structuring then needs better governance in the systems of law and order, where we have a true democratic representation of the people's choices. We should not be electing people with the most wealth to put forward a campaign; we should be employing the most educated people in society, to reason the best mechanisms for any topic, and allow the people to decide what is most appropriate for the whole - as that would be truly democracy then. Currently we have a republic, which has never been functional since Rome, as people always get paid off, and the accumulation of capital always suggests the wealthiest will elect themselves.