To go opposite to Saul, is to assess the inner workings of Yeshua's own teachings in the Synoptic Gospels, and all other writings we can confirm matches the character of Christ within that base standard.

Using the Gospel of Thomas as a foundation isn't being scholarly, as we can compare things like the Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen, and see Thomas includes the nice bits, and misses out some of the prophesied condemnations.

Many Avatars globally have taught here is the Maya - a world between Heaven & Hell to serve our desires, yet in doing so becoming delusional.

Another way to view this realm that we are within, is here is like purgatory: a place where we reincarnate repeatedly (Samsara); until we become righteous enough for Heaven (Moksha).

The Christian & Muslim perspectives have been messed up by later man made traditions; where they've led people to believe that they're sentenced to eternal Hell, when that doesn't happen according to first hand experiences.

It is more common, that once someone learns to repent (apologize & change their ways), they ascend, and come back again.

Selling people that they are God incarnate isn't accurate, as we're basically on the top floor of Hell; matter is dark dense condensed consciousness, and the light from above animates us.

The easiest Parable I have for reality, is imagine we're inside a universal computer game - where everything can be proven mathematical.

God is like a Universal Central Processor (CPU), where the reality is made from Code/Word/Logic, and we are all computer game characters - made just the same like the Archangels (Elohim/Avatars).

When Yeshua said "the Kingdom of God is within" (Luke 17:20-21), when we remove the dimensional quantum physics, we're all inside God's imagination, inside the computer system, and thus the Oneness of Heaven that manifest reality is within all.

This world we're within is far from perfect, and is in a continual state of breaking down, and being recycled; this is where Yeshua tried to correct the Pharisees, and told them that here was Gehenna (Matthew 23:15), and they thought he was saying that their father was the devil (John 8:44).

When Yeshua in the Lord's Prayer is saying, "let it be on earth, as it is in Heaven", he is saying we should be trying to serve others (Altruism), and not be selfish demons like many are in this realm (this as the same core teachings as Krishna, Buddha, Lao Tzu, etc).

It isn't exegeting the eschatology in Matthew 24, Mark 13, Luke 21, Revelation, etc, by doing away with the contexts - if it doesn't match the narratives of our own religious presuppositions.

God foreknew that mankind will eventually destroy the planet again - thus it isn't God's plan; God warns that it will remove those destroying the planet at Judgement Day (Revelation 11:18).

What is prophesied in all 3 Synoptic Gospels is 'as all nations gather around Jerusalem, at that same time the sun & moon will be darkened, and the stars will fall from the sky', this is most likely a meteor storm, as Betelgeuse goes supernova (Isaiah 13:10, Ezekiel 32:7, Zechariah 14:7).

The Parable of the 'Fig before Summer' (Matthew 24:29-35, Mark 13:24-31, Luke 21:25-33 = Isaiah 28:4) is about the closure of the Bed of Adultery (Isaiah 28:9-19+20-21) prior to the Great Tribulation (Revelation 2:22).

Many get confused (Preterists) that when Yeshua said at the end of this prophetic warning in the Synoptic Gospel's, "that this generation shall not pass away, until all these things are fulfilled", he is specifically talking about the return at the Midnight Hour, prior to Armageddon (Revelation 16:15-16, Matthew 25:1-13).

The Elites have underground bases prior to these End Times event, and have rubbed it in everyone's faces in the films, 'Don't Look Up', and 'Greenland'; where they think they will survive by hiding underground (Revelation 6:12-17).

The Book of Revelation is Parable upon Parable, and when we exegete all the descriptive metaphors, it shows what it is talking about; yet we have to be patient, and seek the wisdom required to decipher it - not do away with any books that don't fit our suppositions.

We should be working towards making the world a better place, and the Pharisaic ideas of John, Paul, Simon petros are almost to make a pro Jewish cult about Christ - where you don't have to do anything in the religion, you just believe in the Death of Christ.

The universe is ultimately going to collapse due to the quantum physics not being perfect, and so God has used this current reality as a way to test who is worth keeping, and resurrect those into the World to Come.

When you're quoting the ideas in Isaiah 11:6 of the wolf lying with the lamb, and an age of Godliness, understand that the same contexts is within Isaiah 65:25, which is after a new heaven & earth (Isaiah 65:17).

In the Kalki Purana the final Avatar (Kalki) comes on a white horse from Shambhala (Place of Peace), with the Sword of Justice (Nandaka), to vanquish the demons with fire at the final battle, prior to Satya Yuga.

Odin (Wōdanaz) comes on a white horse prior to Ragnarök, and in the book of Revelation the King of Kings comes on a white horse, from the New Jerusalem (Place/City of Peace).

The Gospel of John was made up by the Sanhedrin to put off the 2nd temple Jews from accepting Yeshua, and then at the same time creating a Snare to the Gentiles (Uneducated).

John 3:16 is immoral, and accuses God of first degree murder.

John, Paul, Simon petros all taught Balaam teachings (Micah 6:5-8), which is to say God requires sacrifice - when God has never required sacrifice; we've done sacrifice to please God.

When John, Paul, Simon petros claim Christ came to die as a sin sacrifice, that is a crime against God; Isaiah 53:10 can be read, 'it pleased the Creator to crush him (to fulfil his plan); yet it makes him grieve, when you turn him into a sin offering.

Isaiah 53:1 interlinks with the Bed of Adultery, where it says, 'who would have believed the rumour', and the Bed of Adultery (Isaiah 28:20-21) goes from (Isaiah 28:9-19) Rumour to Rumour, where Saul creates a Covenant of Death (Isaiah 28:15+18), about the Chief Corner Stone (Isaiah 28:16).

When people start making themselves into Christ Consciousness, they don't hold the authority or understanding to explain things accurately.

Yeshua said, "you will not see me 'until you say blessed is he who comes in the name of the Creator'" (Matthew 23:39, Psalms 118:26).

There is also that which we worship, as well as what we might believe:

Monolatry = Worship of one deity.
Polylatry = Worship of multiple deities.
Idolatry = Worship of idols.
Iconolatry = Worship of religious images or icons.
Alatry = Not worshipping anything.

Here are a few from AI:

Astrolatry = Worship of stars or other celestial objects.
Bibliolatry = Worship of the Bible or other books.
DeMonolatry = Worship of or devotion to demons.
Hagiolatry = Worship of saints.
Heliolatry = Worship of the sun.
Mariolatry / Parthenolatry = Worship of the Virgin Mary.
Necrolatry - Worship of the dead.
Ophiolatry = Worship of snakes.
Patriolatry = Devotion to one's native country.
Pyrolatry = Worship of fire.
Selenolatry = Worship of the moon.
Zoolatry / Theriolatry = Worship of animals.
Dendrolatry = Worship of trees.

@Aaron Abke - Thank you for deconstructing the early Church history - appreciate someone else looking into it.

Having spent the last 22 years discussing this online in detail as a fulfilment of prophecy, I've studied loads, and realized a better correlation of what took place.
Simon petros according to the Book of Acts started the early Ebionite Church with James the Just; by Acts 11:25-26 Saul came along with a Gospel similar to Simon's, and he joined him to create Christianity - So it is potentially possible Simon helped create both the Ebionites first, and then moved onto Christianity.

Now the clever bit, Yeshua called Simon "petros" in Matthew 16:13-23 as a prophetic insult, that he would mislead people: where in Zechariah 3:9 the 'Stone' before Yehoshua is to spread iniquity throughout the land.

Matthew 16:18 is a direct citation of Isaiah 8:14-16's Hebrew into Greek, 'that on this stumbling stone (petros), and this rock (petras) I will build my Church'.


When we remove the fraudulent Gospel of John, the last thing Yeshua said to Simon was, "satan wish to sift you as wheat"(Luke_22:31), in other words 'the accusative nature of man has a use for Simon.'

Saul in Hebrew is spelled the same as the word Sheol; where Saul is then basically named after the Underworld i.e. the devil, and he is prophesied to turn the Chief Corner Stone (Isaiah 28:16) into a Covenant of Death (Isaiah 28:15+18) in the Bed of Adultery (Isaiah 28:9-19+20-21).

This idea of having Apostolic Succession is a fallacy in its self, it was the Pharisees who thought like this (Matthew 23); Yeshua was reiterating what Moses had established, everyone should be on the same level in the congregation, and let God be the authority.

Something to take on board within what is in the Gospel of Thomas, when it says, "Wherever you are, you are to go to James the righteous, for whose sake heaven and earth came into being" - where James is Jacob in Hebrew, so Yeshua (Salvation) gave the Church to Jacob.

That is fascinating that when they killed James the Just, and ended the Ebionites, that then led to the Siege of Jerusalem, as that then fulfils Zechariah 11:11 that the Poor of the Flock understood that when they murdered the Messiah for 30 pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:12-14), that they would then eat each others flesh (Zechariah 11:9), as stated in the Curse of Moses (Deuteronomy 28:53-55).

Aaron when you start assessing the Gospel of John's ideas that there is a beloved Disciple called John - first recognize that the Gospel of John sounds nothing like Yeshua in the Synoptic Gospels: there are no parables within it, repeated usage of "I Am" statements, there is no word 'Gospel', 'faith', etc.

The author of the Gospel of Mark is by John-Mark the Fisherman, whom we also see in the start of the Book of Acts; the Gospel of Mark records the Transfiguration graphically, as if the author was there ('as white as snow') - which would imply that the author of the Gospel of Mark, is John the disciple.

If the Gospel of John was by John the Disciple, you'd expect the Transfiguration to be recorded in detail, yet it isn't mentioned; instead the Gospel of John is generally an eye witness account from a member of the Pharisees & Sanhedrin's High Council, as to be able to know the conversations that took place behind closed doors.

Quantify mistakes; don't dwell on what we can't change.