Oneness - True Faith
wizanda
The cause of differences and quarrel among beliefs? Posted on: 2005/5/30 18:52
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 2812
As far as i can see from my own life, i haven't need any books to learn what is right and wrong, it has been inscribed on my heart.
I presume this is the same for all, you feel when something is unjust.
You don't need to be baptized by water, the holy spirit is far stonger and is everywhere.
Water is a symbol of what the holy spirit does, so that the weak in faith may believe.
if you feel you are wrong, repent and live acording to the precepts that you will be shown through life, of what is right.
God teachs all, man and books only teach a few in comparision.
As for Yeshua bridging the Gap, he did by showing us how to live, the way.
If people choose still not to follow that way, then they will come back again, till they learn and it gets harded plus they are taught in a diffrent way, so they learn.
If you don't believe in reincarnation, explain how buddah's are found? and how i have met many people, who i have know from past lifes?
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Topic
wizanda
Re: Did Jesus and his disciples teach the doctrine of the Trinity? Posted on: 2005/5/30 18:41
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 2812
I agree on a lot, of what you are saying about the trinity

Quote:
Mat 12:31-32 Therefore I say to you, All kinds of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven to men, but the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit shall not be forgiven to men. (32) And whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him. But whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, either in this world or in the world to come.


If the 3 are one, why would Yeshua have said this??
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Topic
wizanda
Re: The Meaning of Life Posted on: 2005/5/30 18:33
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 2812
well.....................

Ok i give up, we will never find the meaning of life because we are not even talking about the same thing.

I can't explain a car, i can tell you how it works, but the person who made it could, all i am saying is as i saw things

Science dosen't always get it right, as you say

So what is the meaing of life then???
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Topic
qOLOp
Re: The Meaning of Life Posted on: 2005/5/30 13:53

Joined:
Posts: 0
Thank you for replying.
Unfortunately your explanation is not consistent with reason.
The following follows:

1) "Dimensions being levels in which we live": It is evident that we live in some dimensions like lenght, width, depth, time-space, gravity as you mentioned. However, you mentioned that anti-matter is the opposite of matter.
It is not reasonable to be able to live in 2 opposites. You are either in A or B but no both. Moreover, anti-matter is not the opposite of matter, IT IS MATTER, composed with particles with sign reversal (electromagnetic charge).
This is science, the rest is science fiction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

2) "Spirit makes up all things": I don't know what you mean by "spirit" but then you mentioned about " God has given me an almost photographic spirit, in which I remember both past life's and what I viewed whilst dead."
What are "all things"?
A rock, a computer, an animal a plant, etc.. ? Do they have spirits? I wonder if God is playing "favorites" and giving some a "photographic spirit" and no to others...

3) "matter is visible anti matter is non visible.": You are half-way right. anti-matter is in matter. Science cannot deal with anything but matter which can be visible or invisible as quantum scientists can tell you.

4) "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so for matter to hold it's self up, there is anti matter."
The Law of action and reaction exists in matter. If something opposite did exist, the law also has to be the opposite, in other words, for every action there is NOT an equal and opposite reaction. This law desn't proof the existence of an opposite of matter, as a matter of fact, there are no "opposites" but rather a complementary.

5) "As for God being the 13th dimension, a dimension must contain the dimensions below it all things in the universe are contained by something, so God is all of the dimensions."
This premise is not reasonable. If God is all of the dimensions, as explained above He couldn't be "opposite" as in matter and anti-matter according to your own definition. God also should have a lenght, a width a depth, etc.. and as we all know, there is not something like that. If you are trying to say that God is "omnipresent", then this is a huge mistake.
All western religions talk about God as "the Father". You cannot have a relationship with everything and call it the "Father"...otherwise, if God is everywhere, He should also be in cats and dogs, etc... Irrational.

6) "the part that gets me and why I say it as if it is a fact, is that the commandments and the I-Ching's numerology align perfectly with this same pattern."

Those are all books written by humans and thus prone to mistakes. I could write a book too and my followers select it as "divine" and defend it to death, even though irrational it may be. We have our intellects, our reason to recognize who God is and to recognize true knowledge.
Your expereince is yours and that becomes your reality, but it cannot be called "the reality" when reasoning is not aligned with it.





Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Topic « 1 ... 823 824 825 (826) 827 828 829 ... 893 » Top