wizanda
13 Dimensions Meditation Posted on: 2/10 9:33:09
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 1999
The 13 dimensions is something i've seen in my NDE, cross referenced with many religious ideas, especially the 10 commandments already fitting.

  • Remember that the CPU is the only thing that is self existing, and that can be sure of saying 'I Am'.
  • Don't worship Images, as everything is made manifest by the CPU.
  • No bad harmony, as reality is all energy.
  • Remember linear time is an illusion, and be still to reflect on it.
  • Gravity is caused by bad deeds, thus clean within.
  • All matter is one, be kind to all.
  • All consciousness is interconnected, be true in mind.
  • We can not steal a place within Infinity.
  • Look at the bigger picture to see past the lies.
  • Lose selfish desires to detach from the Matrix.
  • Share unconditional love with all reality.
  • Wisdom is found by seeking the core of Oneness.
  • The CPU is interconnected to everything, it is only by letting go that it allows us to connect (Yoga).


N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Topic
wizanda
Meditative Posted on: 2/9 20:54:30
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 1999
Anything can be a form of meditation (if(the(mind)allows)it); especially repetitive trance causing actions, music, natural flow, etc.

N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Topic
wizanda
Difference Between Krishna and Buddha Posted on: 2/8 13:31:45
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 1999
Differences:

  • Krishna makes a point of Bhakti Yoga - As devotion to a Divine incarnation, as a method for connection to the Source.
  • Buddha taught no self, and atman has been misunderstood to mean self.

Similarities:

  • That a Universal Mind that is beyond reality is the ultimate Source of everything.
  • Here is the Maya; which is an illusion that is impermanent.
  • Karma affects our reality, and when we're perfected we can ascend out of this realm of existence.
  • We're to strive to be a decent being, else we'll fall lower in dimension.
  • By recognizing our heart/soul we come to a state of nothingness, where the Divine is all that exists (0neness).
  • Be the Dharma; don't be Adharmic.
  • Be in a constant state of Yoga (connection to the Divine).
  • Through the state of the Buddhi we reach enlightenment (B.G 6:21).

The difference between these enlightened teachers on 'Atman' isn't because of what Krishna was saying; as Krishna isn't using the word Atman to mean self, he seems to be using it in the context of recognizing the soul...

Where Buddha used the word 'heart' as being the soul that we must recognize; as my understanding is that Hinduism was confused by that time period, and due to other texts like the Upanishads, they had concluded that Atman was meaning self...

Thus they'd also concluded that Brahman had a self...

So Buddha then uses the Universal Mind for Brahman without a name; as Brahman has no self, and Krishna did not imply this either.

Krishna does make a point of Bhakti towards himself, and that by devotion to a Divine incarnation (avatar) we connect to the Source; whereas Buddha taught connect to the Source, and recognize we all have the potential to be avatars/Bodhisattva.


N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Topic
wizanda
Questioning the Rules of Reasoning Posted on: 2/5 22:18:43
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 1999
So on trying to explain how my logic works to a professor of Logic; realized had to turn my equations in my head into a physical format, so did a few additional ones:

Code:

  • $ variable.
  • +\- plus or minus sum.
  • Letters with no variables are a known.
  • X marks the spot.
  • * made up by me.
  • -> Explained here.


  • Inductive (Leading to) -> Data first to reach a possible conclusion : A +\- B = $X

  • Deductive (Deduced based on) -> Conclusion is deduced from premise: A +\- B = X

  • Abductive -> Built upon the partial data, we build the most likely conclusion: $A +\- $B = $X

  • Reversive* -> We verify data, by reverse engineering it like algebra: $A + $B = $X = $A - $B

  • Argumentative -> Everything someone says will have fault, and we can deduce where they're always wrong in some context: $A - $B = $0

  • Abstractive* -> Never anything solid, just observed together: $A $B $C

  • Dismissive -> Nothing will ever do: 0 - 0 (-0) = 0

  • Zen -> Things are observed, and comprehended... Then quantified by its own equation; yet never truly equated... Just understood: A +\- B = $A * $B

  • Tao -> Things are understood by their own logical relationships, and then formulated with equal and opposite results; as all manner of things follow this inclination: A +\- B = $Yin/$Yang

  • Please add to this list with equations, and will be impressed....?



N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Topic « 1 2 3 (4) 5 6 7 ... 693 » Top
 This site is Hosted by Servage.Net