Oneness - True Faith
wizanda
Logical Why not Evolution Points Posted on: 2007/4/21 21:30
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 2818
From documentaries have watched on why not evolution, and liked these points:

a wood peckers tongue goes around the back of its head, through near the nostrils and then out, a bird goes through the neck as normal.
So how could that evolve was the question of a top X-evolutionist, as for any breed to exist there must be a kind like it or some reason for it forming like it.
A wood pecker being different is without reason, in terms of finding an animal like this or to do a task like that.



Cell reproduction, when a cell clones it self it is direct replica of the first, else we often call these cancer cells, where a cell that isn't known by the body will be attacked by the body.
That same thing applies in the mothers womb also and cells not recognized are often attacked, so where is the chance of anything forming outside of this pattern of natural order.


This is within my own dimensions research and quantum physics taken from Harvard who also it appears have no clue as to the basic mechanics of quantum's (scares me their experimentation, when you begin to understand the immensities of playing with the fabric of reality its self).

Anyways point being is if an atom is made of Photons, neutrons and electrons within these are a 6 sided object with positive and negative; very much like what seems to sound like a star of David to me, i.e. an equilateral star..

Well what told that to co-exist to begin or start to form from random chaos? It is all very well saying it evolved to be as such, yet even after millions and billion of years, times by infinity, we would still have random chaotic patches of evolution.
This is not occurring and we have (that I know of from all my studying) never heard of any occurrence recorded here on earth or seen of wonky space, or chaos reports...black hole is different and is an imploded star,
So how could all be in a perfect state of equilibrium even down to the quantum's, else doubt many of us would be capable of exiting if we didn't have a framework to exist in.


Following that is the symbiosis between us and nature:
Our waste is not, it is converted energy turning what we and all animals eat into soil made of nitrates and phosphates.
Depending the quantities of each, depends on the nourishment and type of plants that will grow well.
For a system like that to evolve, there would be places energy is lost, yet down again to the smallest creatures our waste is ate by other creatures, which again put out waste, which is eat by other creatures; Until finally it comes to a microscopic fungus that then the trees attach to and then feed their roots through that.
Then when the air we breath is in direct contrast to the plants breathing, in the day we breath out more carbon dioxide, which then plants need to grow and during the night plants put out carbon dioxide to even it all out.

So again unless something prearranged organized and coordinated that to co-exist the immense calculations of random chance to say evolution could work falter, and therefore could not be and the only logical explanation is say something had to create it.

N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Top Previous Topic Next Topic
Register To Post