wizanda
Logical Steps To Exegesis Posted on: 10/12 13:47:07
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 2032
It is always best to try to establish a premise on data first, and if not, then it can become a presupp.

We don't make up presupps, if the data can be supplied.

In analysis - data comes before presuppositions; in debate - we start with the most accurate information first i.e. data, premise, presupp.

A presupposition should be examined by logical deduction to show the structure of the claims, to establish if data can be supplied in the first place, to then replace it with a logical premise.

We don't take the minimum illogical presupp, with many pressups contained.

We don't match criteria to something with many contained presupps.

Is it logic if we can tell ourselves presupps, so we don't have to deal with the facts?

To be continued....

N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
wizanda
Re: Logical Steps To Exegesis Posted on: 11/15 12:02:00
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 2032
Basically we should be establishing precedents, not presuppositions.

We shouldn't look for presuppositions to simplify our method to stupidity, that then everything becomes a complexity. - Instead we should analyze the text by its own methods, and adjust our precedents to match.

We adjust a precedent, when more understanding comes along, that gives us a more logical reasoning.

N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Top Previous Topic Next Topic
Register To Post
 This site is Hosted by Servage.Net