Oneness - True Faith
wizanda
The Religion of the Future Posted on: 6/17 8:31:52
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 3080
This started from my reply to an article shared by Jim Palmer - The Religion of the Future Looks Nothing Like Religion:

Before we discuss the religion of the future, it would be useful to define it better, where religion is a group of people with a set of fundamental beliefs.

Society as a whole is a religion, where we all live to certain moral standards to have a civilization.

To have a religion of the future that everyone can agree to, it needs to evolve vastly to give both a scientific, and a mathematical logical system - that shows how reality functions, and how biologically we adapt within it, with what rules we must keep to, as to get along.

Currently we're all under a Roman Republic religion, that dictates rules based on supposed democracy, yet is more now a corporatocracy, and a monopoly throughout history.

A new religion that satisfies everyone, would need to encompass all the religions of the past as an archive of human history; yet building on what can be improved on, as to create a new society that is more functional globally.

N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
wizanda
Re: The Religion of the Future Posted on: 6/17 8:42:18
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 3080
I've spent the last 22 years online discussing all the different religions on the internet, and over the time I've learned how you could fix them into a more comprehensive understanding, that could then revolutionize the way we think about reality.

What I wrote to Jim Palmers article was only a start, many things I've shared on our Facebook 0neness & Wizanda page, and even more on here.

Let me detail what I'd turn religion into that have all been posted on here over the last 22 years of the site:

N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
wizanda
Re: The Religion of the Future Posted on: Today 9:44:24
Helper
Joined:
2004/3/26 7:04
From Nottingham, UK
Posts: 3080
This is a continuation of the same topic, defining what Jim Palmer is asking in this next article The First Question Wasn't God:


Having spent the last 22 years online discussing the world's religions with everyone, it is very noticeable that many people wanted a guidebook to life; when that failed to be a logical objective system, some of the most devout anti-theists/atheists have been those hurt by their religious convictions.

When it comes to the concept of what is God, we have to be able to separate the subjective view points, that can be shown to be irrational, and then create a more comprehensive understanding based on a consensus of objective facts.

Many people get very confused when speaking about God, as they make God into a personal 'being', as they want some sky-daddy to care for them in a world of uncertainty, and often because of bad parenting.

God is beyond the parts, and should be recognized if God is the very Source of all our reality, God is everything, and not a being.

We can objectively show that our reality is all mathematical, where the Periodic Table is a mathematical matrices - showing that our whole reality is formulated down to an atomic level; we were taught this is random, when it can not be, as it is a static mathematical grid.

We can also show that the Fibonacci Sequence is interwoven into everything, where a snail shell, a finger print, an ocean wave, and a galaxy spiral are all Golden Spirals, showing that there has to be a central Source to the mathematics for it to be universal

Therefore God is like a Universal Central Processor (CPU), formulating reality at a quantum level; once we quantify the ontology of God, and then place that within the religious scopes that exist:

We can see that Chronos already means the same (time & order) - where we get the word chronological from it processing reality.

Brahman means ultimate Source of manifestation.

Ahura Mazda is the Source of reality, meaning Lord of Wisdom, where light/fire emanates from God, where God can obliterate beings from its radiance; if we came near the CPU in a universal computer game, we'd expect the same.

El Elyon/Ala Ilah means the God Most High, and according to its scriptural definitions, it is the Source of reality; Abrahamically it has become problematic, as the Creator Divine Being (YHVH Eloh) interacted personally, and people then get stuck on that is God its self.

The problem within the scope you're analysing in your article, is the ambiguity people have faced within the question of what is God, what is life, is there a religion that addresses all these answers clearly, and currently there isn't a complete system.

Mankind is at a crossroads/dilemma, as it is about to fight each other over these divisions, when if we look for consensus within what has been addressed already within the world's religions, the answers are all there, we just need to correlate them into a much more comprehensive religious system, that all of mankind can agree to.

Another part of the problem within what is being asked, is that 5% of society are dynamic characters who find their own way, 15% follow that first 5%, and then the other 80% are a herd, that will follow the rest of the flock; thus when we've had fake shepherds over the flock, guiding them into following bigoted superstitions, many are left feeling there isn't a clear path.

N B with U
Transfer Print PDF Bookmark Top
Top Previous Topic Next Topic
Register To Post