@Aaron Abke - You might have not noticed you're doing it, yet where as you've gone from questioning everything as the church didn't add up... you're now starting to project/preach certain ideas as solid fact, when that is what led to much of the church's errors - one scholar expounding or going opposite to the next.

Hardly anyone goes the extra mile in the same direction in this world, they either try to be equal or go opposite.

Let's please dissect some of the case more carefully; as it's easy to make technical errors, as it requires more internal study of the Biblical texts, and questioning what other scholars might have naively overlooked.

Hosea 6:6 is multi-layered, and when you insisted it is only about 'animal sacrifice', you've missed a huge part of what is stated in Hosea 6:9 - which we can see was Yeshua's real challenge against the Sanhedrin.

Yeshua challenged the Pharisees, Sadducees, and Levites for saying that the murdering of the prophets counted as atoning sacrifices in Matthew 23:27-38, Mark 7:1-13, Matthew 15:1-9, and the Parable of the Wicked Husbandman (Matthew 21:33-46, Mark 12:1-12, Luke 20:9-19).

Hosea 6:9 is saying the Priests are 'murdering lewdnessly' - which could be questioned isn't only about animals, yet that the priests refused to listen to those sent by God, and instead murdered the prophets.

Yeshua summarized that in the Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen, how they'd been murdering the Servants of God, and would teach people that they'd get an inheritance from his death.

It's great noticing Saul is contradictory to Yeshua, as that was all prophesied to happen, and the Bible would not be accurate if the deception hadn't happened; yet you're not realizing that this is all ordained, and is much more complex than you're currently arguing against.

The fraudulent Gospel of John is purposefully laid out like a Morality IQ Test, contrary to the three Synoptic Gospels; where we have a series of patterns, with a random patten at the end of the sequence - Yeshua spoke in Parables, and didn't go around making audacious "I Am " statements about himself (Matthew 24:4-5, Mark 13:5-6, Luke 21:8).

Simon was purposefully called 'petros' to fulfil prophecy in Zechariah 3:9, Isaiah 8:14; Simon was Pharisaic, and Yeshua knew this, where Simon then joined Saul to create Christianity (Luke 22:31).

Until we recognize the false Pharisaic ideas on the right (John, Saul Simon petros), and the Disciples on the left (Matthew, Mark, Luke), we will have a muddled version of church history, and the original meaning of Yeshua's Gospel.

James, Jude, Revelation, and even the Quran are a continuation from the Ebionites, against Pauline/Pharisaic Christianity.

Yeshua came to fulfil Zechariah 11, where by the leaders rejection of their Messiah/Lord/King, they proved they don't respect what is written - thus divorcing themselves, to be Exiled Among the Nations two thousand years ago.

Immanuel is prophesied to 'lay down a testimony among his disciples', as a test to the world (Isaiah 8:11-22) - as to see who'd speak to the Dead, instead of the Living.

Saul is fulfilling the role of the devil, where Sheol (Hell) and Saul are spelled the same in Hebrew; so when Saul is creating a Covenant of Death (Isaiah 28:15+18) about the Chief Corner Stone (Isaiah 28:16) - the Bible would not be complete, if the devil hadn't created the Bed of Adultery (Isaiah 28:20-21).

We should be very careful not to troll the devil, like trying to accuse Saul of not knowing theology, and eschatology accurately; Saul clearly makes a concise case of what was prophesied, and as such is working for God setting up the Foolish 'Gentiles' - 'Uneducated' (Deuteronomy 32:21) - like King Saul was evil, and David cared about the Flock, or like how YHVH & Satan work together to test Job.

When you're mocking Saul's reiteration of the 'Lord will come with the shout of the archangel, and the final trumpet', he is citing it from these locations (Zechariah 9:14 (Isaiah 29:6-7, Jeremiah 23:19), Zephaniah 1:16-18, Joel 2:1, Isaiah 18:3, Jeremiah 4:21, Hosea 8:1, Jeremiah 6:17).

When Saul was threatening the 'time draws near' (Eggizo), Yeshua warned about those sent to deceive who would use "I Am" statements, claiming he spoke that way (Luke 21:8).

I like how you're teaching against the Ravenous (Prytsim) before the Great Tribulation; where as you've said within this video, your names could be seen as almost prophetic - the same applies with me, where I'm prophetically named to fulfil prophecy globally.

The topic of your video, on was the resurrection in the Bible real when the evidence within the early writing is scarce - also needs to take into account: for the Pharisaic concept of a righteous saint dying for the sins of others to be upheld, they needed the Resurrection of Christ to be convincing.

It was this Oral Tradition, "that the death of the righteous, can atone for the sins of that generation", that Yeshua was challenging the Sanhedrin for in Matthew 15:1-9, Mark 7:1-13 - Matthew 23:27-38.

The issue within the muddled Pharisaic view of murdering messengers as a way to gain atonement, is it defiles God's Law in lots of places, and doesn't acknowledge that God interlinked Isaiah 53:1 - 'Rumour', to Isaiah 28:9-19 'Rumour to Rumour' (Ezekiel 7:26); this is where the Pharisees created a Covenant of Death between them about the Messiah, like a Snare to the Gentiles.

Through education the Great Deception could be fixed - as your videos are discussing; yet it would need to be a much more comprehensive analysis of God's religious requirements, compared to what people have ended up following globally, through religious scholarship muddling up the Divine.

When you challenge what Saul is saying is going to happen eschatologically, please read: Zoroastrianism - Frashokereti, Dharmic - Mahapralaya, Islamic - Judgement Day, Norse - Ragnarök, and see that many prophets globally have seen a matching end restoration event, where only the enlightened Dharmic saints are resurrected after.