Many people have been convinced to believe that God, and Angelic Beings say "I Am" to imply divinity; this has come from a misunderstanding of ancient languages over time, the Gospel of John being made up, and a lack of theological structuring - where by dissecting the language errors, it is possible to fix the theological miscomprehensions.

Lets start at the source of it all, that God is beyond "I Am", as God is beyond time, and therefore doesn't exist as an "I", as God is the Source of all the Individuals that exist.

The letter "I" is like a historical timeline; where we have a beginning and an end.

In the Bible the Creator Divine Being (YHVH Eloh) has been misunderstood as being the same as the God Most High (El Elyon); where the Creator/Creation does have a beginning and an end, yet God the Source of reality doesn't, as even when the universe collapses one day, the Source will still be there the same.

Because of the mechanisms of speech, when in the prophetic writings, we have statements of the prophets speaking as God, and they use 'I Am the one speaking', this implies God spoke through them, it isn't that God then becomes the Great "I Am", as God is beyond Self.

In Exodus 3:14 this has been commonly been mistranslated as 'I Am that I Am' (אהיה אשׁר אהיה); it would be better translated, 'Shall be what shall be', as there isn't the word 'I' used in the ancient Hebrew sentence structure.

Ani/Anoki is the word 'I' (אני/ואנכי) in Hebrew, and we can find sentences in the Biblical Hebrew, that have 'Ani Ahayah', and where it doesn't make sense that 'Ahayah' automatically has an 'I' implied, as we have sentences that break that rule.

It's a modern idea of the language that when an Aleph is used before the word, that always automatically implies it must be a person, and therefore there is an 'I' implied; yet there are cases in Biblical Hebrew, that shows it wasn't used that way grammatically in ancient times (Isaiah 47:7, Jeremiah 31:1, Hosea 14:6, Ezekiel 34:24, etc).

Where all these verses have Ani Ahayah (2 Samuel 7:14, 1 Chronicles 17:13, 1 Chronicles 28:6, Jeremiah 32:38, Ezekiel 11:20, Ezekiel 14:11, Ezekiel 37:23, Zechariah 2:9, Zechariah 8:8), and all of these have Anoki Ahayah (Exodus 4:12+15, Deuteronomy 31:23, Judges 11:9, 1 Samuel 23:17, Jeremiah 11:4, Jeremiah 24:7, Jeremiah 30:22, Ezekiel 36:28).

The statement in Exodus 3:14 was meant as a 'memorial to the people', that when the Lord who Makes Become (Yah-HaVaH) says it will become something, then 'it will become, what it will become'.

The terminology Bhagavan Brahma means the 'Lord who makes Become', just the same as Yah-Havah means in ancient Hebrew - this terminology was used to imply the Creator Divine Being in ancient times.

The next problem with the misusage of language is within the Sanskrit, where Atman translates as 'Self', 'Soul', & 'Life'.

We all have an Atman, which is that our Soul ID, interlinks with ourself (Psyche), and we exist as an individual.

We perceive that we have Self, as we have a historical timeline, so we think that we exist, as we can analyse our Self from our soul's perspective.

Some places it says that Brahman is all Atman, and then people perceive that Brahman has a Self like us.

Therefore in Hinduism's concept of Self Realisation, they also believe that when someone goes around making "I Am" statements, that Self is actually God interacting with reality through them.

Whilst it is true that without God, none of us would exist, and so God is the one working through all of us, it doesn't make us God, just because God can use us like a puppet, within a Play (Lila).

Clearly lots of people within this realm called the Maya (which is between Heaven (Svarga) & Hell (Naraka)) would like to claim themselves as more than they are, as it is a realm of selfish desires, and thus it leads us to delusions.

The easiest way to explain theologically the errors being made: Is that we exist within something like a universal super computer; where the God Most High (El Elyon/Ala Ilah)/Brahman/Ahura Mazda is like a CPU (Universal Central Processor).

The Source of reality doesn't have a personal ID (I), and a soul; yet it calculates all of them, and thus within Universal Consciousness, the Source of reality is all of us.

Because in the Bible it says that YHVH is the First & the Last - the Creator Divine being does have a beginning & an end, and thus a timeline (I), whereas the Source of reality doesn't.

Above Brahma (Creator Divine Being) in Hinduism is Brahman (the quality of what Makes Become); within the Biblical theology: the God Most High is the Source of reality, which is beyond form, the Creator is the Arm of God interacting with the reality, and the Messiah is the Hand of God projected into this world.

Buddha tried to correct Hinduism back to the Dharma; where by using a terminology like God, it makes the Source of reality into a thing, when it is everything.

When God is understood as a being, it is then perceived that it has a Self; whereas Buddha, Yeshua, etc, pointed out that the Source of reality is Selfless (Anattā).

The Gospel of John was made up with multiple "I Am" sentences to imply Christ was going round, claiming himself as being God incarnate, when he didn't speak that way in the Synoptic Gospels, and warns that many will be deceived by it (Matthew 24:4-5, Mark 13:5-6, Luke 21:8).

These layers of misunderstanding have caused numerous theological errors for thousands of years; because of this some have then thought "I Am" statements imply divinity, whereas the Divine is selfless.

Yeshua taught selflessness the same as other Avatars, yet due to lousy translations, it hasn't been portrayed correctly; where he told his followers to hate Self ('Psyche' - Luke 14:26), as no one can serve two masters (Matthew 6:24) - Where Mammon implies that which we have faith in i.e. Ourself becomes an idol to serve, before serving the Source of reality.

Between the Dharmic ideas being muddled, as people want to revere themselves as being the Divine, and the errors in the Biblical language it has led some theologians to believe that when Christ in the fake Gospel of John was making "I Am" statements, he was simply implying the same as some Hindu concepts have taught; yet as already suggesting Buddha being an incarnation of Vishnu (the Sustainer), tried to fix this mistake, and lead Dharmic followers back to Selflessness (Anattā).

The ultimate Source of reality is beyond infinite time, so whereas we exist within a Oneness of Creation, the Source exists in a place of 0neness (Zeroness), before anything was even formulated, and thus has a perspective beyond eternity.

When we limit ourself into a vessel, and attach to the idea of being a Self, we miss that we're also part of that infinite scope, and in letting go of all attachment, we reach an enlightened state of Nirvana/0neness.